TIME FRAME
The mid-term evaluation shall take place no later than the last day of the period representing half of the period of study specified in the study programme. In the year in which the doctoral student enters the mid-term evaluation, the deadline for the doctoral student to obtain all credits and grades and to submit documentation is 5 September. In this case, the Director of the Doctoral School shall complete credits and grades pertaining to the study year by 20 September.
In the case of those who have commenced their studies at a date which prevents the doctoral student from completing the study programme in accordance with the academic calendar, as defined in separate regulations, and the doctoral student commences the study programme from the summer semester, the deadline for the doctoral student to obtain all credits and marks and to submit documentation in the year in which the doctoral student enters the mid-term evaluation shall be 21 days before the commencement of the summer semester (after two years from the commencement of the study programme).
EVALUATION COMMITTEE
The mid-term evaluation shall be carried out by an evaluation committee consisting of 3 persons, including at least 1 person holding a postdoctoral degree or a professorial title in the discipline in which the doctoral thesis is being prepared, who is employed outside any entity conducting the doctoral school. The doctoral supervisor and assistant doctoral supervisor cannot be appointed as members of the committee.
Evaluation committees shall be appointed by the Director of the Doctoral School, for each doctoral student individually, from among candidates proposed by the School Council, after the relevant doctoral degree committee in the discipline corresponding to the discipline of the doctoral thesis has given its opinion, at the latest three months before the date of the doctoral student's mid-term evaluation.
At the request of a doctoral student submitted no later than seven days before the date of the mid-term evaluation, a representative of doctoral students may participate in the committee's sessions as an observer. The representative of doctoral students shall be appointed in accordance with the rules laid down in the regulations governing the activities of the doctoral student self-government.
MID-TERM EVALUATION PROCEDURE
Evaluation committees shall conduct a mid-term evaluation of a doctoral student and an evaluation of the doctoral student's academic supervision.
The evaluation committee evaluates the doctoral student based on:
1) the effects of the implementation of the Individual Research Plan (IPB) - this is summarised on the basis of the doctoral student's annual reports, with the opinion of the supervisor(s), from the 2 years of study preceding the mid-term evaluation;
2) an examination interview with the doctoral student concerning the implementation of IPB.
The evaluation committee shall have the opportunity to review the doctoral student's evaluation sheets, together with documentation, from the 2 years of study preceding the mid-term evaluation.
In exceptional situations, it is possible to conduct an examination interview with a doctoral student using technical devices enabling it to be conducted remotely with simultaneous transmission of video and sound. The rules for conducting the interview in the aforementioned mode are defined by separate regulations in force at the University of Lodz. In exceptional situations, a member of the evaluation committee may participate in the work of the committee using technical devices enabling it to be conducted remotely with simultaneous transmission of image and sound.
The work of the committee includes:
(a) reading the doctoral student's documentation,
b) conducting an examination interview with the doctoral student,
c) preparing an evaluation of the doctoral student together with a justification (minutes/notes)
d) evaluation of the doctoral student's academic supervision,
e) preparing the result of the assessment of the scientific supervision provided to the doctoral student (minutes/notes).
The assessment of a doctoral student shall be conducted in accordance with the framework assessment criteria defined by the Director of the Doctoral School, in cooperation with the School Council, adopted pursuant to separate regulations. The evaluation of the scientific care shall take place taking into account the framework evaluation criteria, defined by the Director of the Doctoral School, in cooperation with the School Council, adopted on the basis of separate regulations.
OUTCOME OF THE MID-TERM EVALUATION
The mid-term evaluation of a doctoral student shall end with either a positive or a negative result. The evaluation committee shall prepare a written justification of the mid-term evaluation for each doctoral student. The result of the evaluation and the reasons for it shall be made public. In the event of a negative result of the mid-term evaluation, the doctoral student shall be removed from the list of doctoral students in the doctoral school.
The committee's assessment of the academic supervision shall be presented in writing to the Director of the doctoral school and to the supervisor(s) and/or assistant supervisor.
This result list contains 25 persons; please find bilingual content (Polish+English) on pages 1 and 17.
Result list divided into scientific disciplines
(pozytywny = positive)